Monday, October 5, 2015

Building a 16th Century Portable Camera Obscura (On a Shoestring Budget)

Preface

     I have been fascinated with the idea of cameras obscura for many years. The first one I saw was a dark room with black curtains with a three inch hole cut in them when I was in college. I spent hours in that room watching the people going about their daily lives upside down, totally unaware they were being watched from a pitch black window. A few months ago, I was bemoaning that there was no true place for photography as an A&S entry in the Society for Creative Anachronism, when one of my friends reminded of the camera obscura and how much joy that simple device had given me years ago. It was in that moment I knew I had to build one of my own.

History

     The earliest and simplest forms of the camera obscura can be found in ancient China and Greece. The philosopher Mozi, around 470 BC, is the first individual in recorded history to talk about the most primitive form of camera obscura (a hole in a box or room) as a tool for observing the sun. Both Aristotle and Euclid described the camera obscura as a means of observing the sun and solar eclipses. Euclid's Optics became the foundation for much of the Western research into optical phenomenon.1

     It is quite probable that the camera obscura was being utilized as an astronomical device during the early Middle Ages by the highly educated. All one would need is access to Euclid's Optics and a little curiosity to create a simple camera obscura for experimentation. In the Western world during the 11th century, Abu Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen) from Cairo is the first person to be credited with using a camera obscura as an image projection device and to recommend its uses as a drafting aid. His research on the use of mirrors, lenses, and the eye in Book of Optics is considered the foundation of Western optical science. He also is the author of the modern scientific method.2 In China, both Duan Cheng Shi (863) and Shen Kuo (1086) describe inverted images being projected with a camera obscura.3

     During the Renaissance, mirrors and lens start being used to enhance the image produced by camera obscura. It is also during this time that we see portable models being developed as tools for aiding artists in drawing from real life.4 Leonardo da Vinci was fascinated by both the camera obscura and the eye. It is speculated that he was the first person to add a lens to a camera obscura to obtain sharper images, but it was mathematician Girolamo Cardano who first wrote about doing so in 1550. However, it was Giambattista della Porta who made the use of a lens type camera obscura popular with his writings in Natural Magick.5 Porta was famous for his outrageous parties where he would entertain his guests with live projections onto sheets in a dark room using his camera obscura.6 7 The actual term camera obscura was coined in 1604 by Johannes Kepler. He documented using a portable camera obscura in 1600, though the exact model of camera obscura he used at that time is unknown, it was known to be something far more complicated than he had previously used.8 9

Design

     While sketches, drawings, and detailed descriptions of larger room type cameras obscura are available from the 16th century, aside from mention of their existence and usage, very little actual documentation of what a portable camera obscura looks like still exists from that century. They are described as being in either tents or boxes, but what actual mechanics was used simply is not available. The earliest actual description of how one was designed is from 1620 when Lord Woten was visiting Johannes Kepler to give him one of Francis Bacon's books. He wrote a letter to Bacon describing the device as such: “He hath a little black tent which he can suddenly set up where he will in a field, and it is convertible (like Wind-mill) to all quarters at pleasure capable of not much more than one man, as I conceive, and perhaps at no great ease; exactly close and dark, save at one hole, about an inch and a half in Diameter, to which he applies a long perspective-trunke, with the convex glass fitted to the said hole, and the concave taken out at the other end, which extendeth to about the middle of this erected Tent, through which the visible radiations all the objects without are intromitted, falling upon a paper, which is accommodated to receive them; and so he traceth them with his pen in their natural appearance, turning his little Tent round by degrees, till he hath designed the whole aspect of the field: this I have described to your Lordship, because I think there might be good use made of it for Chorography [the making of maps and topographical views]: For otherwise, to make landskips by it were illiberal, though surely no Painter can do them so precisely. (Reliquiae Wottoniae, London 1651, pp. 413-414.)” 10 While this is about 20 years out of period, it is the first detailed description of a portable camera obscura. More importantly, Kepler writes about using a portable camera obscura as early as 1600 to view an eclipse.

     I propose that some form of what was described in 1620 could have been built before then with knowledge available at the time. The information on the use of lenses to sharpen the cameras image and the use of mirrors to reflect and flip an image was readily available as early as 1558 with the publication of Natural Magick 11 and more concisely discussed by Giovanni Battista Benedetti in 1585.12 I have built my camera using many of the principles of that 1620 description.

Materials

     While there is little description of the actual materials used to build a tent camera obscura, the physical structure was likely built from wood and black dyed canvas. Though the type of wood in period was likely pine or some other type of light wood, I was on an extreme budget. I built my entire camera for under $40. With the exception of the tent legs, I built the entire camera out of found (free) wood. The legs would have been found wood as well, however the 1x1 found wood poles I had were insufficient to hold up the main camera body in a robust manner. I purchased a 2”x6”x14' board to replace those poles. These poles secured into the main camera using half inch metal posts which started out as ½” thick steel metal bolts. In period, a wood glue made from cheese and lime would have been used. I opted to use modern wood glue instead. Modern wood glue at its base is almost the same thing as period wood glues, however it contains a few extra ingredients which speed up drying and help strengthen the bond. Additionally, I also used wood screws to help secure load bearing areas. For many years I believed the common misconception that wood screws were not period. However, while researching nails for this project, I discovered documentation of the use of wood screws in the construction of a bellows from 1556.13 While the tube was likely made using brass in period, a brass tube was way out of my budget, so I built mine using thin wood, wood glue, water and a mold. My lens and mirror are modern. I currently lack the skill set to make my own mirror and lenses. Also, the lead that backed many period mirrors is toxic. I also used modern black paint instead of a period recipe. Because some of my found wood was already painted, period paint would have been insufficient to cover its modern off white analog.

Construction

     As I describe the construction process, please keep in mind this is only the third woodworking project I have done in my life. The prior two were during college were significantly less complex than this project. As I stated before, the majority of my materials I already had or I scrounged from a friend's wood pile or from the scrap box at the Arkansas Regional Innovation Hub where I did most of the building. I spent about a week scrounging free wood, and once I had a decent supply, I designed my camera three separate ways in the 3d software Houdini. This helped me plan out what I was going to build before I got started. In the Middle Ages, this would have been done with pen, paper, and drafting tools; however, since I have not done old school drafting since 2002, I opted for the tool I know best.
     My first step was to cut four 12”x12” squares from ¾” plywood. I did this using both a table saw and a chop saw. I then took a band saw and cut two 9” circles from two of the 12”x12” squares. Then I cut out eight 1.5”x3”x3” blocks using both chop and band saws. I also cut two 10”x12”, one 12”x12”, and one 12”x14” section out of ¼” thick wood composite board as well as nine 12” long pieces of 1”x2” cedar using the chop saw. With all my major pieces cut, I called it a day.
     The next step was to create the tube and tent leg blocks. I created my wooden lens tube by soaking a 1/16” thick sheet of wood in a mixture of one part wood glue to three parts water for a half hour. I then wrapped a three inch pipe with foil. Once the pipe was wrapped, I rolled the soft wood around the pipe, adding wood glue between the wood after the first full wrap of the wood, and taped the whole thing together tight. After the tube was securely wrapped, I glued the eight 1.5”x3”x3” blocks into four 3”x3” cubes and let it all dry for a day.
     Once the glue was dry, I removed the 6” long tube from its mold and created an end cap cut from ¼” scrap board using a drill and skill saw. I had to do this twice because the first one came out too small. I also used the drill and skill saw to cut a hole big enough for the tube to fit though in the two 12”x12” and two 9” diameter boards. The final act for the main body of the camera was to cut 30 degrees off the bottom of the four 3”x3” cube.
     After all the cuts were completed, it was time to assemble the camera. The camera is design to come apart into two separate sections. I assembled the bottom section by attaching the four angled cut 3”x3” blocks to the bottom corners of the 12”x12” board using wood glue and screws. I then glued the two 9” diameter boards together and let them dry for a few hours. Once they were fairly secure, I attached them to the top of the bottom 12”x12” board with wood glue and screws. Finally, I attached the top 12”x12” board to the top of the top 9” diameter board using wood glue and screws. Once the bottom housing was built, I placed the lens tube through the center hole and attached it to the housing using wood glue and (where needed) a conglomerate of wood glue and sawdust. After the bottom section of the camera obscura was completed, I painted both the bottom section and the ¼” thick box walls black and let everything dry overnight.
     The next day, I assembled the top section of the camera obscura by attaching three 1”x2” cedar boards each to the 10”x12” and 12”x12” to create the tops and sides of the upper section using wood glue and screws. The top and side section support boards were then attached to each other also using wood screws. Finally, I attached the 12”x14” back rear support boards of the front and top. This completed the top section which rests on top of the bottom section using an overlap. When assembled The top and bottom sections are secured using simple hook and eye latches. This allows for different lenses to be interchanged within the lens tube housing.
My first set of tent legs used 78” long 1”x1” poles with 3/8” wide bolts screwed several inches into the end and secured with wood glue. I has 1” deep hole drilled into the base of the camera obscura to go in. However, this proved to be insufficiently robust, so I purchased a long 2”x6” board and cut into four 1.75”x2.75”x78” boards using both table and chop saws. I then converted four 5”x½” diameter bolts into chamfered headless bolts using a metal chop saw and a chamfer grinder. These were screwed into the tent poles and secured with wood glue. These proved to be sufficient to hold up the weight of the camera body.
     The final part of the camera to make was the skirt. This was created by sewing five 12” and 58” wide by 80” high trapezoids side by side, with loops to secure to the camera using a rope. Tents from the time period were traditionally sewn together using a sail stitch; however, I opted for a French seam instead to help with light tightness at the joint. The skirt was machine sewn due to time constraints.

1 Cucchiaro, Roberta History of Pinhole Photography - Days of Camera Obscura -https://robertacucchiaro.wordpress.com/2012/10/24/abelardo-morells-camera-obscura-series/
2 Biello, David . The Forgotten History of Muslim Scientists. Scientific American. March 2, 2011. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/forgotten-history-muslim-scientists/
3 TakedaTatsuoki. History of Pinhole Photography - Days of Camera Obscura. http://bonryu.com/atelier_bonryu_e/PH_Salon_1.3.html
4Wencze, Norma. “The Optical Camera Obscura II Images and Texts.” Inside the Camera Obscura – Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Wolfgang Lefèvre (ed.) 2007 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Page 14
5 Tavira, Torre. “Short Story about the Camera Obscura.” http://www.torretavira.com/en/pdf/cameras_obscuras.pdf
6 Porta, Giambattista della. Magia Naturalis. 1558
7 Horstmanshoff, Manfred. King, Helen. Zittel, Claus. Blood, Sweat and Tears - The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Leiden, Netherlands. IDN Publishing. 2012. Pages 569-570
8Piccolino, Marco. WadeNicholas J. Galileo's Visions: Piercing the Spheres of the Heavens by Eye and Mind. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2014. Page 262
9 Lienhard, John H. “No. 124: CAMERA OBSCURA.” http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi124.htm
10 Wencze, Norma. “The Optical Camera Obscura II Images and Texts.” Inside the Camera Obscura – Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Wolfgang Lefèvre (ed.) 2007 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Page 22
11 Wencze, Norma. “The Optical Camera Obscura II Images and Texts.” Inside the Camera Obscura – Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Wolfgang Lefèvre (ed.) 2007 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Page 15
12Steadman, Philip. Vermeer's Camera: Uncovering the Truth Behind the Masterpieces. Oxford University Press. 2001

13 AgricolaGeorgius. De Re Metallica. 1556 


Bibliography

Cucchiaro, Roberta. “History of Pinhole Photography - Days of Camera Obscura.” https://robertacucchiaro.wordpress.com/2012/10/24/abelardo-morells-camera-obscura-series/


Biello, David. “The Forgotten History of Muslim Scientists. Scientific American. March 2, 2011.” http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/forgotten-history-muslim-scientists/

Takeda, Tatsuoki. “History of Pinhole Photography - Days of Camera Obscura.” http://bonryu.com/atelier_bonryu_e/PH_Salon_1.3.html

Wencze, Norma. “The Optical Camera Obscura II Images and Texts.” Inside the Camera Obscura – Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Wolfgang Lefèvre (ed.) 2007 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

Tavira, Torre. “Short Story about the Camera Obscura.” http://www.torretavira.com/en/pdf/cameras_obscuras.pdf

Porta, Giambattista della. Magia Naturalis. 1558

Horstmanshoff, Manfred. King, Helen. Zittel, Claus. Blood, Sweat and Tears - The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Leiden, Netherlands. IDN Publishing. 2012

Steadman, Philip. Vermeer's Camera: Uncovering the Truth Behind the Masterpieces. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2001

Piccolino, Marco. Wade, Nicholas J. Galileo's Visions: Piercing the Spheres of the Heavens by Eye and Mind. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2014

Lienhard, John H. “No. 124: CAMERA OBSCURA.” http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi124.htm

Agricola, Georgius. De Re Metallica. 1556


Visual Documentation
3d Mockup

Late night tent sewing math. #tent #sewing #cameraobscura #sca #trigonometry


Measure thrice, cut once. Working on the camera obscura. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Cutting up boards to build my camera obscura... in a kilt. Yeah, I'm that guy. #sca #scalife #cameraobscura #511tactical #kilt


Cutting round pieces of camera obscura with circular saw. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Most of the cuts for the business end of the camera obscura are done. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


The tube for the camera obscura will be made from this.  #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


The wood is soaked in a 3:1 ratio of water to modern cheese glue. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Wood is left wrapped around the mold to dry over night. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


3x3x1.5 blocks glued and clamped to dry over night. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Completed lens tube with end cap and and intended lens for camera obscura.#sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Making holes for the camera obscura. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


30 degree housing for tent legs attached to the bottom of the business end of the camera obscura. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Now that I have documentation of wood screws going back to 1554, using both wood glue and screws. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


The business end of the camera obscura is coming together. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Oh no, Mr Bill. The hole is too big!#sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Mix sawdust and wood glue to make an aggregate. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Fill extra space in hole with sawdust/glue aggregate. Problem solved.#sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Don't forget to fix the bottom hole with the homemade wood goo. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura


Bottom section of the business end of the camera obscura is done. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub #millertime


Tent poles cut to length for camera obscura. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


Top housing is complete for the camera obscura. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


Cutting bolts for the camera obscura. A chop saw Fir metal... seriously epic. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


Newly cut thicker tent poles for camera obscura. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


Burrs removed and slight rough chamfer added to the end of metal inserts for tent poles. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


The camera obscura lives! #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


Camera obscura fully assembled.#sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub


The camera obscura works... the projected image just did not photograph well with the phone. #sca #scalife #woodworking #cameraobscura #arinnovationhub








Monday, July 6, 2015

Instagram Scenes from Highberry Music Festival

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on



A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on


A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A video posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on


A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on


A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

A photo posted by Grav Weldon (@lordgrav) on

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Lunch at One Eleven at the Capital

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121365905294/hard-at-work-arkansasfood

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121369812814/bread-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock-oneelevenlr

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121369411849/fresh-bread-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121370160554/wild-boar-sausage-with-delightful-sour-gerken

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121370360814/wild-boar-sausage-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121379950124/wild-boar-sausage-at-one-eleven-at-the-capital

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121370786964/melon-salad-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121379944079/melon-at-one-eleven-at-the-capital-nofilter

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121379948269/bread-basket-at-one-eleven-at-the-capital

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121371153049/delicious-sour-gerken-pickles-at-one-eleven-in

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121379946239/colorado-lamb-at-one-eleven-at-the-capital-lamb

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121371508014/lamb-with-penne-pasta-and-vegetables-at-one-eleven

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121371946284/colorado-lamb-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121373412234/tomato-salad-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121379989354/tomato-salad-started-at-one-eleven-at-the-capital

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121373281539/cold-vegetable-soup-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121380422399/vegetable-soup-with-parmesan-at-one-eleven-at-the

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121372295509/venison-ravioli-with-wild-mushrooms-at-one-eleven

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121380628909/venison-ravioli-with-wild-mushrooms-at-onw-eleven

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121372927354/venison-ravioli-with-wild-mushrooms-at-one-eleven

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121373634999/apple-marscapone-pie-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121373759689/apple-marscapone-pie-at-one-eleven-in-little-rock

http://tiedyetravels.tumblr.com/post/121381582584/apple-marscapone-at-one-eleven-at-the-capital

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Squirrel Cook Off

     While the thought of a squirrel cook off may seem strange to many of you, the World Championship Squirrel Cook Off is an annual event held by Squirrels Unlimited. Squirrels Unlimited an international squirrel hunting organization with it's center of operations in Monticello, Arkansas. These guys take their sport pretty seriously and the cook off is not only an opportunity to kick up their heels a bit, but also to introduce the public to their favorite endeavor. Attached below are images from their annual shendig.








More images can be found at my Facebook.

Friday, August 1, 2014

Review: Guardians of the Galaxy

This review will be twofold, as will most of my reviews be in the future. I will first talk about the film itself as a whole. This is what will interest most of you. The second section of this critique will discuss the visual aesthetic and technical implementation of the film's visual effects and cinematography. Feel free to skip past the section if you have no interest in that sort of thing.

I must say I was quite pleased with this film. It is almost the perfect summer popcorn flick. It was well written and well acted. The visual effects were extremely well executed. When I first started seeing promos for this at the beginning of the year, I was guardedly excited about what looked to be a very good summer action movie. While I am an old comic book buff, I was not terribly familiar with this particular comic series. For those of you who do not know, the Guardians of the Galaxy is one of the more obscure Marvel comics. Its characters were occasional guest stars in both the Avengers and Ironman. I cannot comment on how close the movie was to the comics. They are not a series I ever read and I made it a point not to read them so that I could judge the movie on its own merits. People are always saying that the book or comic book is better than the movie, but I feel that this is often the case because people will bring preconceived notions to the theater instead of walking in with a clean slate, and judging the story presented on its own merits. I did not want to do that on this film.

The movie started off with a sadly beautiful vignette which told the main character's (Starlord) origin story without saying too much, but still getting a feel for what kind of person the character would become. From that point on the story became a wild crazy ride perfect pacing. This movie is like a roller coaster, once you've been introduced to the main character, it sends you right into the story at breakneck speed. Make no mistake, this movie is a thrill ride.

The actors, both CG and real-life were both compelling and convincing. Considering two of the main roles were generated entirely with CG, this brings what is already a very well acted movie to a whole new level of artistry. You have to keep in mind any time one of the physical actors is interacting with either Groot or Rocket Raccoon, they are acting at a spot on a green screen studio. The character animators did their work well. The animated characters and their voice actors worked together seamlessly. This was a very physical movie. There were easily as much or more physical special effects as there were computer-generated effects. The stuntmen should be applauded for job well done.

I think what surprised me most about this movie was how much it made me laugh. It was peppered with lots of jokes and snarky ribs at popular culture. The best one most people will miss because they won't stay through the closing credits. I think it is quite appropriate that there was a nod to the worst comic book adaptation in what I feel is one of the best comic book adaptations ever made. I don't make this comment lightly. So stick around for the end of the credits. The gag is well worth it.

One last thing about this movie... The soundtrack is the phenomenal. All the tunes throughout the movie are supposed to be from a tape called "Awesome Mix."  I have to agree it is a very awesome mix. It is definitely worth picking up if you don't already have the songs in your MP3 collection.

On a more technical critique of this movie's visual effects, I have to say this movie is nearly flawless. It did not make the mistake that so many movies with high amounts of CG effects make. It was dirty. Often computer-generated effects look perfect, to perfect. You just did not see that very often in this film. The few exceptions to this were that occasionally Groot's leaves were just slightly plasticky. It did not happen in all his scenes, but it did happen often enough that I noticed in the first viewing. Granted, I was watching this on an IMAX screen, but I was also watching it in 3-D which will by its very nature make things slightly fuzzy and hide too perfectly rendered elements. However, this was only in a few scenes and a fairly minor gripe. For the most part, the shaders and lighting had a very gritty, imperfect feel which communicated a sense of realism to what were quite fantastic elements in this movie. This grittiness is very important to create the high level of suspension of disbelief that a space opera requires.

The effects created by particle simulations were near-perfect and often quite beautiful. The use of shallow depth of field with several of the particle simulations greatly enhanced the sense of reality. The scene that most immediately comes to mind is when Groot released a cloud of glowing elements from his body. That scene simply would not have worked nearly as well without they creative use of depth of field. The only real flaw I saw in any of the effects created by particle simulations were the multi-ship shield generators that were being used towards the end of the movie. Even now flaw would not likely be visible to the average moviegoer. After you spent nine years sticking your nose in particle simulations it is hard not to see a default noise system being used. Yet again, this is a minor gripe. There truly is no such thing as a movie with completely flawlessly implemented visual effects, however, this movie came real damn close.

I also would like to comment on the character animation of both Groot and Rocket.  As I stated before, the digital characters and the voice actors mashed flawlessly. The standard movement animations and facial animations looked lifelike, well it's lifelike as any walking tree or upright talking raccoon is likely to look. The secondary animations on Groot, whether it be growing branches or flowers, added a great deal of depth to a character that really only had one true line.  A special shout out should go to the hair animators who took care of Rocket's fur. Seeing a talking raccoon waking up with bed fur had me absolutely in stitches.

Finally, I would like to talk about how well this film translated to three dimensions. I am a huge fan of stereography. I have dabbled in 3-D photography for most of my career. I have a very good eye for both good and bad 3-D images. The IMAX 3-D version of this was nearly flawless, at least on a technical standpoint. If you are sitting in the center of the theater, you will see almost no 3-D artifacts. This is very rare. I saw avatar in 3-D a few years ago and found that the IMAX 3-D was not nearly as good as the 3-D at regular theaters. Also, both of those gave me eyestrain and the IMAX version gave me a migraine. I am one of those lucky people was quite prone to migraines. If you're 3-D is badly implemented, at the very least I'm going to get a headache by the end of the film. This is the first two hour or longer movie that I have sat down and watched that has left me with not a single bit of eyestrain. Whatever you're doing IMAX, keep up the good work. 

The only negative comment I have about the 3d has nothing to do with how the stereography has been implemented, but with film aesthetic itself. In both photography and movie anesthetic, we use depth of field to both communicate depth and to direct the viewer to our chosen focal point. Unfortunately, the extreme shallow depth of field used in movies for certain scenes just is not translate as well to a 3-D film as it does a 2-D film. The main reason for this is the human eye has a greater depth of field than most camera optics. We certainly can switch focuses much quicker than any camera on the market. Also, the focal length of the human eye is much shorter than most lenses used in creating photographs and motion pictures, allowing for greater depth of field. Bokay, while being very important for communication in a 2-D medium, can sometimes be distracting in the 3-D medium. That isn't to say that the cinematographers haven't created a visually magnificent piece, it is simply optimized for the 2-D medium aesthetically.  The only true solution to this would literally be to shoot for two different movies: to use a shallower depth of field for the scenes for the 2-D cut and a somewhat deeper depth of field for the 3-D version. However, this would make film production much more expensive. It might be interesting to see somebody shoot a film just for 3-D with these considerations towards depth of field.

I give this movie a rating of 9.7 G's out of 10. Don't miss out on catching this movie this weekend. You don't want your buddies spoiling it for you in the break room on Monday.


Aspiring New Movie Critic

I bet you're asking yourself, “What qualifies this guy to critique movies.” My best qualification is that I love movies. I have been a movie buff my entire life. While I enjoy just about every movie genera, my personal favorites are science fiction, fantasy, and action films. However, I have other qualifications besides just being a movie buff. I spent nine years studying 3-D animation and visual effects at the Savannah College of Art and Design and the University of Illinois. During that time, I learned how to critique not only my own work, but also the work of my peers and colleagues. I spent many hours watching and analyzing movies, not only for their plots and acting, but also to critique their visual effects, both digital and physical. I also spent most of my spare time through college learning the art of photography. As it turned out, the art of the lens turned out to be my true vocation. However, I still love movies and plan on talking about on a semi-regular basis. What's the point of having a soapbox if you don't actually use it.